Pastoralists’ perceptions of drought-induced human-carnivore conflict in community conservancies of Kenya’s south rift

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kimaili, David
dc.contributor.author Maithya, Harrison M.
dc.contributor.author Kauti, Matheaus K.
dc.date.accessioned 2026-11-11T09:54:19Z
dc.date.available 2026-11-11T09:54:19Z
dc.date.issued 2026-09-28
dc.identifier.citation African journal of climate change and resource sustainability, volume 5, issue 2, 2026 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 790-9638
dc.identifier.uri https://journals.eanso.org/index.php/ajccrs/article/view/5876/6201
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/8474
dc.description DOI: https://doi.org/10.37284/ajccrs.5.2.5876 en_US
dc.description.abstract Increasing drought frequency and intensity across East Africa are altering ecological conditions and intensifying interactions between pastoral communities and large carnivores, posing significant challenges for biodiversity conservation and pastoral livelihoods. Although drought is widely recognised as a major ecological driver of human-carnivore conflict (HCC), limited empirical evidence exists on how pastoral communities perceive drought-induced conflicts and whether increasing climatic stress influences attitudes toward large carnivore conservation. This study examined pastoralists’ perceptions of drought-induced HCC in Olkiramatian and Shompole community conservancies in Kenya’s South Rift. A cross-sectional household survey was conducted among 146 respondents selected through stratified random sampling. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis, and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) to examine relationships among drought perceptions, attitudes toward large carnivores, perceived safety, and perceptions of HCC mitigation strategies. The findings revealed that 74.7% of respondents experienced intense drought conditions, while 35.6% perceived recent droughts as moderately severe. Despite these climatic challenges, attitudes toward large carnivores remained generally positive, with 41.1% of respondents reporting somewhat positive attitudes and 31.5% indicating that they felt very safe living alongside carnivores. Structural model results showed that drought perceptions had weak and statistically non-significant effects on attitudes toward HCC (β = 0.137, p = 0.439) and perceptions of mitigation strategies (β = 0.173, p = 0.448). The findings suggest that increasing drought alone does not determine community attitudes toward large carnivores; rather, coexistence is influenced by broader social and institutional factors that sustain tolerance despite increasing climatic stress. The study highlights the importance of integrating climate adaptation, community participation, and inclusive conservation governance to strengthen biodiversity conservation, ecosystem resilience, and long-term human-carnivore coexistence in drought-prone pastoral landscapes. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject drought en_US
dc.subject human-carnivore conflict en_US
dc.subject pastoralists en_US
dc.subject community perceptions en_US
dc.subject community conservancies en_US
dc.subject biodiversity conservation en_US
dc.subject climate change en_US
dc.subject Kenya en_US
dc.title Pastoralists’ perceptions of drought-induced human-carnivore conflict in community conservancies of Kenya’s south rift en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Dspace


Browse

My Account