Farmer managed natural regeneration (FMNR) as a catalyst for land resource restoration: Insights from selected Kenya Counties

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kimatu, Josphert N.
dc.contributor.author Munyao, Carol M.
dc.contributor.author Maithya, Harrison M.
dc.contributor.author Musyoka, Sonnia N.
dc.contributor.author Muriu, Felista W.
dc.contributor.author Kiruki, Harun M.
dc.contributor.author Ngei, Lucia M.
dc.contributor.author Wafula, Humphrey
dc.contributor.author Mbuthia, Kezia W.
dc.contributor.author Matata, Joseph
dc.date.accessioned 2026-11-04T09:07:35Z
dc.date.available 2026-11-04T09:07:35Z
dc.date.issued 2026-04-14
dc.identifier.citation African journal of climate change and resource sustainability volume 5, issue 1, 2026 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 790-9638
dc.identifier.uri https://journals.eanso.org/index.php/ajccrs/article/view/4808/5235
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/8460
dc.description DOI: https://doi.org/10.37284/ajccrs.5.1.4808 en_US
dc.description.abstract Farmer Managed Natural Regeneration (FMNR) has emerged as a transformative, community-driven approach for rehabilitating degraded lands, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. This mixed-methods study assessed the impact of FMNR practices across four sites in three Kenyan counties: Osiligi (Kajiado County), Mara (Narok County), and Kalawa and Kitise (Makueni County). Using data from 1,632 lead farmer households, complemented by focus group discussions, key informant interviews, and field observations, the study evaluated land degradation extent, restoration achievements, household well-being, and FMNR adoption and awareness rates. Results revealed notable regional differences: Osiligi exhibited the highest degraded land area (3,407 hectares) and the largest absolute area under restoration (893 hectares), although Mara achieved the highest restoration-to-degradation ratio (86.6%). A statistically significant association was found between county of residence and household perceptions of ability to provide for family needs (χ² = 203.23, p < 0.0001). FMNR adoption rates varied, with Mara leading at 66% and Kitise lagging at 41%, despite overall high awareness levels ranging from 82% to 97%. ANOVA tests confirmed significant differences across the four sites regarding land restoration efforts and socio-economic outcomes (F (3,4) = 18.74, p = 0.0045). The findings affirm FMNR’s potential as a scalable, low-cost restoration strategy that simultaneously enhances ecosystem health and rural livelihoods. However, they also highlight the need for context-specific interventions that address adoption gaps, strengthen community institutions, and align land restoration efforts with broader climate adaptation and sustainable development goals. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject farmer-managed natural regeneration en_US
dc.subject land restoration en_US
dc.subject arid and semi-arid lands en_US
dc.subject household well-being en_US
dc.subject kenya en_US
dc.title Farmer managed natural regeneration (FMNR) as a catalyst for land resource restoration: Insights from selected Kenya Counties en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Dspace


Browse

My Account