Model checks for Bayesian estimation and forecasting of health coverage indicators in low- and middle-income countries

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Alkema, Leontine
dc.contributor.author Mooney, Shauna
dc.contributor.author Kagoye, Sophia
dc.contributor.author Ferreira, Leonardo Z.
dc.contributor.author Mady, Roland
dc.contributor.author Wilson, Emily
dc.contributor.author Bietsch, Kristin
dc.contributor.author Adero, Godfrey
dc.contributor.author Kaberia, Peter M.
dc.contributor.author Kananura, Rornald M.
dc.contributor.author Mutua, Martin K.
dc.contributor.author Njeri, Anne
dc.contributor.author Wekesa, Eliud
dc.date.accessioned 2026-06-11T12:25:05Z
dc.date.available 2026-06-11T12:25:05Z
dc.date.issued 2026-05-18
dc.identifier.citation Philosophical transactions A, volume 384, issue 2321, 2026 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rsta/article/384/2321/20240609/481977
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/8387
dc.description https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2024.0609 en_US
dc.description.abstract Statistical models are needed to produce estimates and forecasts of health coverage indicators in low- and middle-income countries, where data are often sparse and of uneven quality. We consider a class of Bayesian transition models for this purpose and propose a practical set of model checks that can be used by analysts who are not specialists in Bayesian (transition) models. These checks include residual analyses and assessments of model parameters in restricted and full models, based on in-sample and out-of-sample model fits. We apply the approach for estimation of two different health coverage indicators: the proportion of women who received recommended antenatal care during pregnancy and the proportion of children who receive recommended vaccinations. The checks indicate the model performs well for antenatal care, and they highlight limitations and opportunities for improvement when modelling immunization coverage. Overall, we show how systematic model checking can clarify and communicate the strengths and limitations of models used to estimate and forecast global health coverage indicators: the proportion of women who received recommended antenatal care during pregnancy and the proportion of children who receive recommended vaccinations. The checks indicate the model performs well for antenatal care, and they highlight limitations and opportunities for improvement when modelling immunization coverage. Overall, we show how systematic model checking can clarify and communicate the strengths and limitations of models used to estimate and forecast global health coverage indicators. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher The royal Society publishing en_US
dc.subject Bayesian hierarchical temporal model en_US
dc.subject model validation en_US
dc.subject global health en_US
dc.title Model checks for Bayesian estimation and forecasting of health coverage indicators in low- and middle-income countries en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Dspace


Browse

My Account