| dc.contributor.author | Opio, Borden | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mutyambai, Daniel M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cheseto, Xavier | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cheseto, Xavier | |
| dc.contributor.author | Omuse, Evanson R. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jalloh, Abdul A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mumo, Naomi N. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Schuman, Meredith C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chidawanyika, Frank | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-12-05T08:22:06Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-12-05T08:22:06Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-12-01 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Discover plants, volume 2, article number 346, 2025 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 3005-1207 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44372-025-00420-z.pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.seku.ac.ke/xmlui/handle/123456789/8203 | |
| dc.description | https://doi.org/10.1007/s44372-025-00420-z | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Push-pull cropping integrates repellent ‘push’ plants with attractive ‘pull’ plants to manage insect pests and other ecosystem services. Whilst field evidence showed that push-pull cropping provides protection against diamondback moth (DBM) (Plutella xylostella), the mechanisms remain underexplored. This study investigated the influence of soil legacies formed under the push-pull system on kale (Brassica oleracea var. acephala) defense against DBM larvae. We compared responses of DBM larvae to kale grown in medium and old push-pull-conditioned soil to those grown in control soil using behavioural assays, larval performance tests, and glucosinolate profiling. Behavioural and feeding assays revealed a significant reduction in DBM larval survival (0–24%), feeding activity (leaf area eaten: 0.31– 0.68 cm²), and orientation (28–32%) on kale grown in push-pull-conditioned soil. Phytochemical analyses indicated elevated concentrations of key glucosinolates, including gluconapin, glucoiberin, sinigrin, and glucobrassicin (0.01–1.08 ng sinigrin equivalents/g) from kale grown in push-pull-conditioned soil compared to those grown in control soil (0.1–0.87 ng sinigrin equivalents/g). Notably, glucocheirolin and glucotropaeolin were uniquely detected in kale planted in old push-pull-conditioned soil. These secondary metabolites are associated with defense against insect herbivory and potential dietary benefits to humans. Our study demonstrates that soil conditioned by push-pull can enhance the kale’s defense against pest herbivory through plant-soil feedback, paving the way for the sustainable production of kales. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
| dc.subject | agroecology | en_US |
| dc.subject | pest resistance | en_US |
| dc.subject | plant-soil feedback | en_US |
| dc.subject | plant defense | en_US |
| dc.subject | secondary metabolites | en_US |
| dc.subject | sustainable pest management | en_US |
| dc.subject | trophic interactions | en_US |
| dc.title | Push-pull cropping system soil legacies enhance glucosinolate production and subsequent defense against diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) larvae in Kale (Brassica oleracea) | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |