dc.contributor.author |
Wambua, Stephen |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Wunscher, Tobias |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Wollni, Meike |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2016-03-03T08:40:08Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2016-03-03T08:40:08Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2011 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Tropentag, October 5-7, 2011, Bonn |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://www.tropentag.de/2011/abstracts/links/Wambua_d3Oj030s.pdf |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/1963 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Biomass has remained the dominant source of energy used by most rural households in
the developing world. Current use patterns have been linked to adverse effects on forest
resources. Alternative fuels such as kerosene could mitigate these negative effects. In order
to design policies that enhance the use of alternative fuels a first step is to understand the
determinants of fuel quantity and fuel types. This is crucial for informing forest conservation
policy without making local households worse off. This research looks into the factors
that determine the use of energy by rural households living next to a common property
resource. Empirical results are based on a quantitative study of 286 households randomly
selected from the community living in villages within 5 km from the edge of Kakamega
forest in western Kenya. The data collected include details of the quantities and values of
different energy types used as well as household and demographic attributes. A demand
system for household energy use is estimated using a two stage LES-AIDS model. Results
show that household income is an important, but not the only determining factor for the
type and level of fuel consumption. The household size, public forest governance rules and
prices of different fuel types also play an essential role. The results of this study confirm
biomass fuels are used alongside modern fuels without displacing them, evidence of fuel
stacking as opposed to fuel switching, a phenomenon also observed in urban households.
The public forest is an important source of biomass fuel supplying firewood to 50 % and
charcoal to 15 % of sampled households. The consumption of kerosene tends to increase
with the price of charcoal, suggesting potential for a change to a more forest conserving fuel
with increasing scarcity of charcoal. A price instrument coupled with effective institution
for forest management can enhance the conservation of the common pool forest. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Fuel demand |
en_US |
dc.subject |
fuel switching |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Kakamega forest |
en_US |
dc.subject |
LES- AIDS |
en_US |
dc.title |
Determinants of household fuel use and options for fuel switching in rural Western Kenya |
en_US |
dc.type |
Presentation |
en_US |