Behaviour and biology ofChilo partelluson maize landraces

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mutyambai, Daniel M.
dc.contributor.author Midega, Charles A. O.
dc.contributor.author Bruce, Toby J. A.
dc.contributor.author Berg, Johnnie van den
dc.contributor.author Pickett, John A.
dc.contributor.author Khan, Zeyaur R.
dc.date.accessioned 2015-10-14T08:31:24Z
dc.date.available 2015-10-14T08:31:24Z
dc.date.issued 2014
dc.identifier.citation Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata153:170–181, 2014 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://www.researchgate.net/publication/266856925_Behaviour_and_biology_of_Chilo_partellus_on_maize_landraces
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/1769
dc.description DOI: 10.1111/eea.12237 en_US
dc.description.abstract Plants defend themselves against herbivores through activation of both constitutive and induced defences. Previous studies reported that egg deposition on maize landraces induces the release of vol- atiles that attract parasitoids, but little is known on the effect of these volatiles on subsequent herbi- vore oviposition. In addition, larval preference and development on these maize landraces is unknown. We evaluated six landraces and one hybrid maize variety for their resistance to Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Larval orientation, settling, arrest and dispersal, feed- ing, development, survival, and subsequent oviposition of moths were determined for individuals reared on each of these varieties under laboratory and screen house conditions. For oviposition pref- erence studies, all treatments were initially exposed to egg deposition whereas the control treatments were not. Larval preference was generally higher for hybrid maize, compared to the landraces. Simi- larly, first-instar feeding on maize leaves was more intense in hybrid maize than in four of the six landraces. The amount of food consumed and assimilated by third instars over a 24-h period was, however, not different among the maize varieties. Larval survival was significantly lower in maize landraces (32%) compared to hybrid maize (54%). However, there was no difference in the larval development period between any of the treatments. Two-choice oviposition assays showed that moths preferred non-exposed maize landraces for subsequent oviposition, whereas in the hybrid, there was no difference in oviposition preference between exposed and non-exposed plants. Although the mechanism of larval suppression was beyond the scope of this study, it was inferred that the landraces showed some resistance to C. partellus feeding and that initial egg deposition on these landraces deters further colonisation by the herbivore. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Wiley en_US
dc.subject constitutive and induced defences en_US
dc.subject larval feeding en_US
dc.subject survival and development en_US
dc.subject maize en_US
dc.subject oviposition en_US
dc.subject Lepidoptera en_US
dc.subject Crambidae en_US
dc.title Behaviour and biology ofChilo partelluson maize landraces en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Dspace


Browse

My Account