Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/471
Title: Agricultural land allocation in small farms around Maasai Mau forest, Kenya and the implications on carbon stocks
Authors: Kibwage, Jacob K.
Atela, Joanes O.
Denich, Manfred
Kaguamba, Richard
Keywords: Carbon payments
forest management
land use tradeoffs
on-farm
smallholders
Issue Date: Feb-2012
Publisher: Academic Journals
Citation: Journal of Ecology and The Natural Environment Vol.4(4), pp. 98-108 , February 2012
Abstract: Recent assessment of the Maasai Mau forest-part of the largest remaining natural forest in Kenya revealed that direct expansion of small farms into the forest in response to population and climate induced land use pressures, largely contributed to a 42% loss in forest cover between 1995 and 2008. In response, the Kenyan government plans to integrate farmers into forest management initiatives through incentive schemes such as on-farm carbon payments. To contribute to the envisaged carbon payment scheme(s), a regression model depicting the most efficient land use design with higher net carbon addition was derived based on existing land use types, respective allocations and carbon stocks in 30 small farms of 2 to 6 ha occurring within 5 km from the forest boundary. Results confirmed that smallholder land allocation is a function of first, food crops for subsistence (p≤0.01) followed by cash crop for income (p≤0.01) while tree planting is least prioritized. Aboveground carbon stock per farm, on average, amounted to 13.2 t/ha. Based on a linear model (R2=68%), trading off 10% of open grazing land for farm forest, while unchanging the traditional land allocated to food crops and cash crops, doubles carbon stocks per hectare of these farms. While incorporating carbon sequestration potential into small farms require careful tradeoffs between environmental, social and economic land demands, it presents a win-win incentive oriented strategy to restore Maasai Mau and the larger Mau forest. However, such initiatives must be informed by ordered empirical research on land use demands and associated costs and benefits within the forest and its surrounding.
Description: DOI: 10.5897/JENE11.119
URI: http://www.academicjournals.org/article/article1380100400_Atela%20et%20al.pdf
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/471
ISSN: 2006-9847
Appears in Collections:School of Agriculture, Environment, Water and Natural Resources Management (RP)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kibwage_Agricultural land allocation....PDFfulltext611.41 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.