Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/471
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKibwage, Jacob K.-
dc.contributor.authorAtela, Joanes O.-
dc.contributor.authorDenich, Manfred-
dc.contributor.authorKaguamba, Richard-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-16T07:58:53Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-16T07:58:53Z-
dc.date.issued2012-02-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Ecology and The Natural Environment Vol.4(4), pp. 98-108 , February 2012en_US
dc.identifier.issn2006-9847-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.academicjournals.org/article/article1380100400_Atela%20et%20al.pdf-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/471-
dc.descriptionDOI: 10.5897/JENE11.119en_US
dc.description.abstractRecent assessment of the Maasai Mau forest-part of the largest remaining natural forest in Kenya revealed that direct expansion of small farms into the forest in response to population and climate induced land use pressures, largely contributed to a 42% loss in forest cover between 1995 and 2008. In response, the Kenyan government plans to integrate farmers into forest management initiatives through incentive schemes such as on-farm carbon payments. To contribute to the envisaged carbon payment scheme(s), a regression model depicting the most efficient land use design with higher net carbon addition was derived based on existing land use types, respective allocations and carbon stocks in 30 small farms of 2 to 6 ha occurring within 5 km from the forest boundary. Results confirmed that smallholder land allocation is a function of first, food crops for subsistence (p≤0.01) followed by cash crop for income (p≤0.01) while tree planting is least prioritized. Aboveground carbon stock per farm, on average, amounted to 13.2 t/ha. Based on a linear model (R2=68%), trading off 10% of open grazing land for farm forest, while unchanging the traditional land allocated to food crops and cash crops, doubles carbon stocks per hectare of these farms. While incorporating carbon sequestration potential into small farms require careful tradeoffs between environmental, social and economic land demands, it presents a win-win incentive oriented strategy to restore Maasai Mau and the larger Mau forest. However, such initiatives must be informed by ordered empirical research on land use demands and associated costs and benefits within the forest and its surrounding.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAcademic Journalsen_US
dc.subjectCarbon paymentsen_US
dc.subjectforest managementen_US
dc.subjectland use tradeoffsen_US
dc.subjecton-farmen_US
dc.subjectsmallholdersen_US
dc.titleAgricultural land allocation in small farms around Maasai Mau forest, Kenya and the implications on carbon stocksen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Agriculture, Environment, Water and Natural Resources Management (RP)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kibwage_Agricultural land allocation....PDFfulltext611.41 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.