Existence and functionality of emergency obstetric care services at district level in Kenya: theoretical coverage versus reality

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mwangi, Moses
dc.contributor.author Echoka, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.author Kombe, Yeri
dc.contributor.author Dubourg, Dominique
dc.contributor.author Makokha, Anselimo
dc.contributor.author Evjen-Olsen, Bjørg
dc.contributor.author Byskov, Jens
dc.contributor.author Evjen Olsen, Øystein
dc.contributor.author Mutisya, Richard
dc.date.accessioned 2015-02-16T09:14:58Z
dc.date.available 2015-02-16T09:14:58Z
dc.date.issued 2013-03-25
dc.identifier.citation BMC Health Services Research March 2013, 13:113, en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1472-6963
dc.identifier.uri http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/694/art%253A10.1186%252F1472-6963-13-113.pdf?auth66=1424077721_8b5313984f0c326fd8ef7825e49e904f&ext=.pdf
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/929
dc.description DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-113 en_US
dc.description.abstract Background The knowledge on emergency obstetric care (EmOC) is limited in Kenya, where only partial data from sub-national studies exist. The EmOC process indicators have also not been integrated into routine health management information system to monitor progress in safe motherhood interventions both at national and lower levels of the health system. In a country with a high maternal mortality burden, the implication is that decision makers are unaware of the extent of need for life-saving care and, therefore, where to intervene. The objective of the study was to assess the actual existence and functionality of EmOC services at district level. Methods This was a facility-based cross-sectional study. Data were collected from 40 health facilities offering delivery services in Malindi District, Kenya. Data presented are part of the “Response to accountable priority setting for trust in health systems” (REACT) study, in which EmOC was one of the service areas selected to assess fairness and legitimacy of priority setting in health care. The main outcome measures in this study were the number of facilities providing EmOC, their geographical distribution, and caesarean section rates in relation to World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations. Results Among the 40 facilities assessed, 29 were government owned, seven were private and four were voluntary organisations. The ratio of EmOC facilities to population size was met (6.2/500,000), compared to the recommended 5/500,000. However, using the strict WHO definition, none of the facilities met the EmOC requirements, since assisted delivery, by vacuum or forceps was not provided in any facility. Rural–urban inequities in geographical distribution of facilities were observed. The facilities were not providing sufficient life-saving care as measured by caesarean section rates, which were below recommended levels (3.7% in 2008 and 4.5% in 2009). The rates were lower in the rural than in urban areas (2.1% vs. 6.8%; p < 0.001 ) in 2008 and (2.7% vs. 7.7%; p < 0.001) in 2009. Conclusions The gaps in existence and functionality of EmOC services revealed in this study may point to the health system conditions contributing to lack of improvements in maternal survival in Kenya. As such, the findings bear considerable implications for policy and local priority setting. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject Kenya en_US
dc.subject Maternal health en_US
dc.subject Emergency obstetric care en_US
dc.subject Life-saving en_US
dc.title Existence and functionality of emergency obstetric care services at district level in Kenya: theoretical coverage versus reality en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Dspace


Browse

My Account