Comparative analysis of on-farm timber conversion systems in Kenya

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Muthike, George
dc.contributor.author Kanali, Christopher
dc.contributor.author Shitanda, Douglas
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-07T09:00:47Z
dc.date.available 2023-12-07T09:00:47Z
dc.date.issued 2013-07
dc.identifier.citation Journal of Horticulture and Forestry, Vol. 5(6), pp. 74-80 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2006-9782
dc.identifier.uri https://academicjournals.org/journal/JHF/article-abstract/A7F85953280
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/7447
dc.description DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/JHF12.033 en_US
dc.description.abstract Exploitation of trees on private farms in Kenya is mainly by chain, bench and pit sawing systems, whose efficiency has not been well established. The sawing systems were evaluated for their performance using three species: Eucalyptus saligna, Grevillea robusta and Prosopis juliflora. Data was subjected to analysis of variance and mean comparisons. Results showed significant differences (P<0.05) among the sawing systems. Chainsaw system recovered more logs from the trees with a log recovery rate of 76%, which was significantly higher than those of 65 and 63% for bench and pit saws respectively. Timber recovery rates of 39.8, 35.9 and 30.0% for pit, bench and chain saws respectively were observed. The chainsaw system produced the highest rate of timber output (0.23 m3 /man-hour), differing significantly from benchsaw (0.17) and pit saw (0.08). Chain and bench saws recorded significantly different fuel consumption rates of 8.41 and 14.86 m3 l -1 respectively. Timber sawn with the chain saw had the highest dimensional deviation (+/-5.53 mm), which was significantly higher than deviations for benchsaw (+/-3.55 mm) and pitsaw (+/-2.44 mm). The study shows that, although chainsaw recorded the highest timber production rate per man hour, it had the lowest timber recovery. Timber sawn with this system had the highest dimensional deviations. Bench saw was more economical for sawing large diameter logs, with chainsaw performing better for small diameter logs. The three systems recorded very low recovery of timber and are thus not suitable for processing timber, in this error of diminishing tree cover unless they are improved. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Academic Journals en_US
dc.subject Efficiency en_US
dc.subject sawing systems en_US
dc.subject timber recovery en_US
dc.subject production rate en_US
dc.subject size en_US
dc.subject deviation en_US
dc.title Comparative analysis of on-farm timber conversion systems in Kenya en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Dspace


Browse

My Account