Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/8387
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlkema, Leontine-
dc.contributor.authorMooney, Shauna-
dc.contributor.authorKagoye, Sophia-
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Leonardo Z.-
dc.contributor.authorMady, Roland-
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Emily-
dc.contributor.authorBietsch, Kristin-
dc.contributor.authorAdero, Godfrey-
dc.contributor.authorKaberia, Peter M.-
dc.contributor.authorKananura, Rornald M.-
dc.contributor.authorMutua, Martin K.-
dc.contributor.authorNjeri, Anne-
dc.contributor.authorWekesa, Eliud-
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-11T12:25:05Z-
dc.date.available2026-06-11T12:25:05Z-
dc.date.issued2026-05-18-
dc.identifier.citationPhilosophical transactions A, volume 384, issue 2321, 2026en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/rsta/article/384/2321/20240609/481977-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/8387-
dc.descriptionhttps://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2024.0609en_US
dc.description.abstractStatistical models are needed to produce estimates and forecasts of health coverage indicators in low- and middle-income countries, where data are often sparse and of uneven quality. We consider a class of Bayesian transition models for this purpose and propose a practical set of model checks that can be used by analysts who are not specialists in Bayesian (transition) models. These checks include residual analyses and assessments of model parameters in restricted and full models, based on in-sample and out-of-sample model fits. We apply the approach for estimation of two different health coverage indicators: the proportion of women who received recommended antenatal care during pregnancy and the proportion of children who receive recommended vaccinations. The checks indicate the model performs well for antenatal care, and they highlight limitations and opportunities for improvement when modelling immunization coverage. Overall, we show how systematic model checking can clarify and communicate the strengths and limitations of models used to estimate and forecast global health coverage indicators: the proportion of women who received recommended antenatal care during pregnancy and the proportion of children who receive recommended vaccinations. The checks indicate the model performs well for antenatal care, and they highlight limitations and opportunities for improvement when modelling immunization coverage. Overall, we show how systematic model checking can clarify and communicate the strengths and limitations of models used to estimate and forecast global health coverage indicators.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe royal Society publishingen_US
dc.subjectBayesian hierarchical temporal modelen_US
dc.subjectmodel validationen_US
dc.subjectglobal healthen_US
dc.titleModel checks for Bayesian estimation and forecasting of health coverage indicators in low- and middle-income countriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Humanities and Social Sciences (JA)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Alkema_Model checks for Bayesian estimation and forecasting of health coverage indicators....pdfabstract4.95 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.