Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/8259
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorManono, Bonface O.-
dc.contributor.authorKimiti, Jacinta M.-
dc.contributor.authorMusyoka, Damaris K.-
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-10T12:06:35Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-10T12:06:35Z-
dc.date.issued2026-02-05-
dc.identifier.citationNitrogen, volume 7, issue 1, 2026en_US
dc.identifier.issn2504-3129-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scilit.com/publications/f8cd51c68fc135b606f3521fb2c312a9-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.seku.ac.ke/xmlui/handle/123456789/8259-
dc.descriptionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/nitrogen7010020en_US
dc.description.abstractNitrogen leaching from land and farms is a major global issue that pollutes water, damages ecosystems, and accelerates climate change. This review synthesizes evidence from the literature on how interactions among landscape characteristics, sources of nitrogen input, and temporal dynamics shape leaching vulnerability. It identifies conditions under which nitrogen is most likely to be transported through soil systems into aquatic environments. This review reveals that leaching vulnerability is strongly conditioned by soil hydraulic properties and topographic position. Coarse-textured upland soils exhibit substantially greater nitrate mobilization than finer-textured, hydrologically buffered lowland soils. Fertilizer formulation and application timing further modulate loss potential, with late-season mineral nitrogen inputs disproportionately contributing to subsurface export relative to demand-synchronized applications. Most of the nitrogen leaching occurs outside the active growing period, when vegetative uptake is suppressed and drainage intensity is highest. Farmers can lower nitrate runoff by using targeted fertilization, cover crops, and nitrification inhibitors, while landscape-scale features like controlled drainage and vegetative buffers provide additional downstream filtration. The effectiveness of regulatory approaches is amplified when aligned with economic incentives and regionally calibrated nutrient thresholds. Advances in high-resolution observation platforms and process-based predictive tools offer new capacity for anticipatory management, although widespread deployment is limited by financial and institutional constraints. Collectively, these insights support the development of more targeted and sustainable nitrogen management strategies.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.subjectnitrate leachingen_US
dc.subjectlandscape spatial configurationen_US
dc.subjectagricultural catchmentsen_US
dc.subjectgroundwater pollutionen_US
dc.subjectnitrogen dynamicsen_US
dc.subjectmitigation strategiesen_US
dc.subjectagricultural management practicesen_US
dc.titleLandscape determinants of nitrogen leaching risk: mechanisms, impacts, and mitigation strategiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Agriculture, Environment, Water and Natural Resources Management (JA)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Manono_Landscape determinants of nitrogen leaching risk....pdfAbstract4.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.