Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/7986
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOkello, Cornelius-
dc.contributor.authorWambiji, Nina-
dc.contributor.authorKihia, Susana W.-
dc.contributor.authorOngeso, Nehemiah-
dc.contributor.authorMwamburi, Samuel M.-
dc.contributor.authorWandera, Anthony-
dc.contributor.authorDemory, Marie-Estelle-
dc.contributor.authorOwuor, Margaret A.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-08T08:14:35Z-
dc.date.available2025-05-08T08:14:35Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental DNA, 2025; 7:e70110en_US
dc.identifier.issn2637-4943-
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/edn3.70110-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.seku.ac.ke/xmlui/handle/123456789/7986-
dc.descriptionhttps://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70110en_US
dc.description.abstractRestoration of degraded arid and semi-arid lands (ASALs) dryland ecosystems gained traction globally with the enactment of the Bonn Challenge and UN Decade of Restoration. This has been domesticated in Kenya's context by The Forest and Landscape Restoration Implementation Plan (FOLAREP). However, effectively monitoring restored ecosystems is crucial but challenging because of data gaps and technical hurdles, highlighting the need for innovative approaches to assess and restore biodiversity. This study aimed to pilot soil environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding to detect species compositions rapidly, evaluate population structures and abundances, and characterize taxonomic groups. The results from this study serve as a foundational step toward monitoring the impact of water bunds, a restoration approach on biodiversity conservation, in Lower Naibunga Community Conservancy in Laikipia County, Kenya. This study used 16S rDNA and rbCL metabarcoding to assess prokaryotic and plant diversity. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria species attributed to enhancing nutrient availability and improving plant resilience to abiotic stress were prevalent across all six sites: Lorubai (Site 1), Burtany (Site 2), Nkirashi (Site 3), Losopukia (Site 4), Munushoi (Site 5), and Loika (Site 6). Plant species attributed to drought tolerance and rangeland rehabilitation were also identified. The study demonstrates the potential of eDNA metabarcoding as an effective tool for monitoring nature-based solutions (NbS) interventions to enhance biodiversity and ecosystem restoration in ASALs.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.subjectarid and semi-arid landsen_US
dc.subjectbiodiversity conservationen_US
dc.subjecteDNAen_US
dc.subjectmonitoringen_US
dc.subjectnature-based solutionsen_US
dc.subjectrestorationen_US
dc.titleHarnessing eDNA metabarcoding to monitor species diversity in restoration sites: Insights from Laikipia, Kenyaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Agriculture, Environment, Water and Natural Resources Management (JA)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Okello_Harnessing eDNA metabarcoding to monitor species diversity....pdfabstract4.27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.