Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/7442
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMegaptche, Christelle A.
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hanki
dc.contributor.authorMusau, Peter M.
dc.contributor.authorWaita, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorAduda, Bernard
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-07T07:59:17Z
dc.date.available2023-12-07T07:59:17Z
dc.date.issued2023-11-29
dc.identifier.citationEnergies, Volume 16 Issue 23 10.3390/en16237836, 2023en_US
dc.identifier.issn1996-1073
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/23/7836#:~:text=3.2.-,Photovoltaic%20Panel%2FWind%20Turbine%2FBattery%2FElectrolyzer%2DH2,of%200%20%3C%20LPSP%20%3C%201.
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/7442
dc.descriptionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/en16237836en_US
dc.description.abstractThis work undertakes a techno economic comparative analysis of the design of photo voltaic panel/wind turbine/electrolyzer H2 tank–fuel cell/electrolyzer H2 tank (configuration 1) and photovoltaic panel/wind turbine/battery/electrolyzer H2 tank (configuration 2) to supply electricity to a simulated house and a hydrogen powered vehicle on Jeju Island. The aim is to find a system that will make optimum use of the excess energy produced by renewable energies to power the hydrogen vehicle while guaranteeing the reliability and cost effectiveness of the entire system. In addition to evaluating the Loss of Power Supply Probability (LPSP) and the Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE), the search for achieving that objective leads to the evaluation of two new performance indicators: Loss of Hydrogen Supply Probability (LHSP) and Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH). After anal ysis, for 0 < LPSP < 1 and 0 < LHSP < 1 used as the constraints in a multi objective genetic algorithm, configuration 1 turns out to be the most efficient loads feeder with an LCOE of 0.3322 USD/kWh, an LPSP of 0% concerning the simulated house load, an LCOH of 11.5671 USD/kg for a 5 kg hydrogen storage, and an LHSP of 0.0043% regarding the hydrogen vehicle load.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.subjecthybrid energy configurationsen_US
dc.subjecttechno‑economic analysisen_US
dc.subjecthydrogen‑powered vehicleen_US
dc.subjectexcess energy utilizationen_US
dc.subjectenvironmental impacten_US
dc.titleTechno economic comparative analysis of two hybrid renewable energy systems for powering a simulated house, including a hydrogen vehicle load at Jeju Islanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Engineering and Technology (JA)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Megaptche_Techno economic Comparative....pdfabstract105.94 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.