Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/6606
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOchungo, Pamela-
dc.contributor.authorVeldtman, Ruan-
dc.contributor.authorAbdel-Rahman, Elfatih M.-
dc.contributor.authorMuli, Elliud-
dc.contributor.authorNg'ang'a, James-
dc.contributor.authorTonnang, Henry E. Z.-
dc.contributor.authorLandmann, Tobias-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-03T07:09:54Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-03T07:09:54Z-
dc.date.issued2021-10-
dc.identifier.citationEcological Applicationsen_US
dc.identifier.issn1051-0761-
dc.identifier.urihttps://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/eap.2483-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/6606-
dc.descriptionDOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2483en_US
dc.description.abstractLandscape fragmentation and habitat loss at multiple scales directly affect species abundance, diversity, and productivity. There is a paucity of information about the effect of the landscape structure and diversity on honey bee colony strength in Africa. Here, we present new insights into the relationship between landscape metrics such as patch size, shape, connectivity, composition, and configuration and honey bee (Apis mellifera) colony strength characteristics. Remote-sensing-based landscape variables were linked to honey bee colony strength variables in a typical highly fragmented smallholder agroecological region in Kenya. We examined colonies in six sites with varying degrees of land degradation during the period from 2017 to 2018. Landscape structure was first mapped using medium resolution bitemporalSentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery with an optimized random forest model. The influence of the surrounding landscape matrix was then constrained to two buffer distances, i.e.,1 km representing the local foraging scale and 2.5 km representing the wider foraging scale around each investigated apiary and for each of the six sites. The results of zero-inflated negative binomial regression with mixed effects showed that lower complexity of patch geometries represented by fractal dimension and reduced proportions of croplands were most influential at local foraging scales (1 km) from the apiary. In addition, higher proportions of woody vegetation and hedges resulted in higher colony strength at longer distances from the apiary(2.5 km). Honey bees in moderately degraded landscapes demonstrated the most consistently strong colonies throughout the study period. Efforts towards improving beekeeper livelihoods, through higher hive productivity, should target moderately degraded and heterogeneous landscapes, which provide forage from diverse land covers.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEcological Society of Americaen_US
dc.subjecthoney beesen_US
dc.subjectKenyaen_US
dc.subjectlandscape fragmentationen_US
dc.subjectSentinel-1en_US
dc.subjectSentinel-2en_US
dc.subjectzero-inflated negativebinomial regressionen_US
dc.titleFragmented landscapes affect honey bee colony strength at diverse spatial scales in agroecological landscapes in Kenyaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Science and Computing (JA)



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.