Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/2697
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKieti, Raphael N.
dc.contributor.authorKauti, Matheaus K.
dc.contributor.authorKisangau, Daniel P.
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-26T07:33:50Z
dc.date.available2016-10-26T07:33:50Z
dc.date.issued2016-10
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Scientific Research & Reports 12(2): 1-13en_US
dc.identifier.issn2320-0227
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedomain.org/download/MTY0NDBAQHBm.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/2697
dc.description.abstractAim: The aim of the study was to find out how livelihood strategies and socio-economic conditions influence watershed degradation in Kaiti sub-watershed in Makueni County, Kenya, and their effects on the environment. The study examined the livelihood strategies and options of the people as well as the socio-economic conditions contributing to watershed degradation, investigated the land use methods practiced and how they affect the sub-watershed. Study Design: The study used a descriptive survey research approach to obtain data on socioeconomic characteristics of the study sites as well as historical trends of land use. Place and Duration of Study: South Eastern Kenya University, Kitui County, Kenya; between June to August 2015. Methodology: The study used multiple methods such as household surveys, observations, Focus Group Discussant interviews (FGDs), key informant and experts’ interviews, drawn from sampling of households systematically along vertical and horizontal transect lines. Structured and semistructured questionnaires were used to collect data from 101 community and key informants. The data collected was analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) and Microsoft Excel 2010. Results: The study established that low food production as reported by the farmers (78%) and reduced income and livelihood (75%) were consequences of watershed degradation in the study area. Landlessness at 39% (S.E=0.311 z= 1.311 sig.0.190), illegal encroachment at 18% (S.E=0.555 z= -0.604 sig.0.546), and laxity in law enforcement at 27% (S.E=0.481 z=0.227 sig. 0.821) were other factors mentioned by the farmers as contributing to watershed degradation. Conclusion: The study concluded that these conditions predisposed farmers to adopt inappropriate farming methods and unsustainable livelihood strategies which compromised the watershed’s environmental integrity. The study sought to make recommendation for efficient watershed management.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSCIENCEDOMAIN Internationalen_US
dc.subjectLand useen_US
dc.subjectwatershed degradationen_US
dc.subjecthousehold livelihoodsen_US
dc.subjectMakuenien_US
dc.titleHousehold livelihood strategies and socio economic conditions influencing watershed degradation in Kaiti sub-watershed, Makueni County, Kenyaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Agriculture, Environment, Water and Natural Resources Management (JA)



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.