Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/2646
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKanui, Titus I.
dc.contributor.authorKibwage, Jacob K.
dc.contributor.authorMwobobia, Royford M.
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-13T06:36:21Z
dc.date.available2016-09-13T06:36:21Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International, Vol.: 6, Issue.: 4: 1-12, 2016en_US
dc.identifier.issn2454-7352
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.journalrepository.org/media/journals/JGEESI_42/2016/Jul/Kanui642016JGEESI26620.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/2646
dc.descriptionDOI : 10.9734/JGEESI/2016/26620en_US
dc.description.abstractThe study was commissioned by the Kenya Water Towers Agency (KWTA) to provide information that would guide the agency in achieving one of its key strategic objectives of providing community livelihood support for sustainable management of water towers. The focus of the study was to provide information on how the neighbouring community benefits from Chyulu hills water tower and also provide suggestions of the community on livelihood activities that can be undertaken to ease pressure on the hills. The study was done at Chyulu hills water tower and the neighbouring community. Questionnaires, key informant interviews, field observations, photography and Focus Group Discussions (FGD) data collection methods were used to collect data. Focused group discussions with representatives of 10 key stakeholders involved in Chyulu hills conservation and interviews through structured questionnaires to 12 randomly selected community members residing within 10 Km from the boundary of the water tower were undertaken. Resident’s mainly apportioned their land for crop; livestock farming or both but had no land ownership documents. The main three livelihood options were livestock keeping, crop farming and poultry rearing while main crop preferences were green grams, maize and cowpeas farming. Main benefits from the forest were medicinal herbs, rain, grazing and recreation facilities. The main development options were provision of water, bee keeping, goat farming, poultry rearing, capacity building, dairy & fish farming and tree farming in the order which they are listed. A development action plan was recommended to ease pressure and prevent destruction of the water tower. Those who benefit from the water tower could contribute towards the community development actions. The information gathered gives insights into ways of protecting water towers in Kenya and elsewhere in the world.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectChyulu hills
dc.subjectwater tower
dc.subjectaction plan
dc.subjectlivestock
dc.subjectcrop
dc.subjectcrop; poultry
dc.titleWater Tower Ecosystems Services and Diversification of Livelihood Activities to Neighbouring Communities; A Case Study of Chyulu Hills Water Tower in Kenyaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Agriculture, Environment, Water and Natural Resources Management (JA)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kanui_Water Tower Ecosystems Services....pdfabstract163.73 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.