Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/1975
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOtieno, Hesbon-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Dawei-
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-10T06:53:47Z-
dc.date.available2016-03-10T06:53:47Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citation11th International Conference on Hydroinformatics HIC 2014, New York City , USAen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=cc_conf_hic-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/1975-
dc.description.abstractWater resources systems are important for various uses such as agriculture, water supply, energy, transportation, recreation, ecosystems, among others. Design of water resources systems is of increasing importance due to the ever increasing demand for efficient water management. This study explores water resources assessment in two different regions with contrasting climate, socio-economic development level and data availability. The Thames catchment in England is in the temperate zone, which is data rich and is at a high socioeconomic development level; while, The Tana catchment in Kenya is in the tropics, which is data poor and at a low socioeconomic development level. Accurate estimation of precipitation is a key process in assessing water resources. To furnish optimal input data, point rainfall at un-gauged locations from measurements at surrounding sites is used in obtaining a continuous surface of relevant information. Rainfall interpolation based on the four commonly used methods (namely Thiessen polygon, Thinplate, Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) and Kriging) is done and validation is achieved by Leave-one out cross validation (LOOCV) method. Different rain gauge densities have been explored to search the optimum interpolation method so that appropriate schemes could be adopted for the catchments in England and Kenya. Other data sources in addition to rain gauges are collected and processed including temperature, stream flow, and solar radiation. Furthermore, hydrological models suited to different catchment characteristics are explored and used to assess different water resources utilisation options. The commonality and differences for the data and the model between the two regions are then analysed. Finally, data fusion techniques are used to integrate data from different sources to quantify data uncertainty and maximise their accuracy. Findings from the study are useful to water resources specialists when assessing water resources across different regions of contrasting climates, geographical zones, socioeconomic development levels and data availability.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCUNY Academic Worksen_US
dc.titleComparative Study On Water Resources Assessment Between Kenya And Englanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Agriculture, Environment, Water and Natural Resources Management (CS)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Otieno_Comparative study on....pdffulltext571.69 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.