Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/1769
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMutyambai, Daniel M.-
dc.contributor.authorMidega, Charles A. O.-
dc.contributor.authorBruce, Toby J. A.-
dc.contributor.authorBerg, Johnnie van den-
dc.contributor.authorPickett, John A.-
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Zeyaur R.-
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-14T08:31:24Z-
dc.date.available2015-10-14T08:31:24Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata153:170–181, 2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.researchgate.net/publication/266856925_Behaviour_and_biology_of_Chilo_partellus_on_maize_landraces-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/1769-
dc.descriptionDOI: 10.1111/eea.12237en_US
dc.description.abstractPlants defend themselves against herbivores through activation of both constitutive and induced defences. Previous studies reported that egg deposition on maize landraces induces the release of vol- atiles that attract parasitoids, but little is known on the effect of these volatiles on subsequent herbi- vore oviposition. In addition, larval preference and development on these maize landraces is unknown. We evaluated six landraces and one hybrid maize variety for their resistance to Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Larval orientation, settling, arrest and dispersal, feed- ing, development, survival, and subsequent oviposition of moths were determined for individuals reared on each of these varieties under laboratory and screen house conditions. For oviposition pref- erence studies, all treatments were initially exposed to egg deposition whereas the control treatments were not. Larval preference was generally higher for hybrid maize, compared to the landraces. Simi- larly, first-instar feeding on maize leaves was more intense in hybrid maize than in four of the six landraces. The amount of food consumed and assimilated by third instars over a 24-h period was, however, not different among the maize varieties. Larval survival was significantly lower in maize landraces (32%) compared to hybrid maize (54%). However, there was no difference in the larval development period between any of the treatments. Two-choice oviposition assays showed that moths preferred non-exposed maize landraces for subsequent oviposition, whereas in the hybrid, there was no difference in oviposition preference between exposed and non-exposed plants. Although the mechanism of larval suppression was beyond the scope of this study, it was inferred that the landraces showed some resistance to C. partellus feeding and that initial egg deposition on these landraces deters further colonisation by the herbivore.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.subjectconstitutive and induced defencesen_US
dc.subjectlarval feedingen_US
dc.subjectsurvival and developmenten_US
dc.subjectmaizeen_US
dc.subjectovipositionen_US
dc.subjectLepidopteraen_US
dc.subjectCrambidaeen_US
dc.titleBehaviour and biology ofChilo partelluson maize landracesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Science and Computing (JA)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mutyambai_Behaviour and biology ofChilo partelluson maize landraces .pdfAbstract6.49 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.