Integrating stakeholder preferences into ecosystem services mapping in Yala wetland, Kenya

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Githiora-Murimi, Yvonne W.
dc.contributor.author Owuor, Margaret A.
dc.contributor.author Abila, Romulus O.
dc.contributor.author Olago, Daniel
dc.contributor.author Oriaso, Silas
dc.date.accessioned 2022-03-16T09:09:51Z
dc.date.available 2022-03-16T09:09:51Z
dc.date.issued 2022-03-11
dc.identifier.citation Ecosystems and people, Volume 18, Issue 1, 146–163 2022 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/26395916.2022.2039774
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/6776
dc.description DOI: 10.1080/26395916.2022.2039774 en_US
dc.description.abstract Wetlands such as the Yala swamp in Kenya are among the most important and increasingly threatened ecosystems globally due to their ecological significance and complexity, and the importance of the ecosystem services (ES) they provide to wetland communities. Appropriate governance and management of wetlands thus require the use of interdisciplinary tools that take into account both ecological and social considerations. This study used the matrix model combining social preferences with GIS-based maps of land use/land cover (LULC) to analyse the capacity of the Yala swamp to supply ES (flows). We engaged a total of 132 participants who manage and use natural resources in the wetland through a participatory process to identify ES, map LULC, and score the flow of ES on a scale of 0 to 5 using the matrix model. We also analysed the impacts of stakeholder characteristics (gender, environmental expertise, and location) on the scoring of the matrix. Results showed high average scores (score of 4) for trees and shrubs, papyrus, and water bodies across a range of provisioning, regulating and cultural services. The study found that gender and location had little influence on the respondents’ scores, while environmental conservation experts provided scores significantly higher than local resource users (farmers/fishermen) across the ES types. Overall, the study contributes to understanding: 1) the importance of linking LULC with ES provision to inform landscape management and 2) the need to incorporate a range of stakeholder perspectives in studies making use of expert knowledge and preferences, for inclusive management. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Taylor & Francis en_US
dc.subject Ecosystem services en_US
dc.subject mapping en_US
dc.subject stakeholder perceptions en_US
dc.subject landscape management en_US
dc.subject Yala swamp en_US
dc.title Integrating stakeholder preferences into ecosystem services mapping in Yala wetland, Kenya en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Dspace


Browse

My Account