Seroprevalence of influenza A virus in pigs and low risk of acute respiratory illness among pig workers in Kenya

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Osoro, Eric M.
dc.contributor.author Lidechi, Shirley
dc.contributor.author Marwanga, Doris
dc.contributor.author Nyaundi, Jeremiah
dc.contributor.author Mwatondo, Athman
dc.contributor.author Muturi, Mathew
dc.contributor.author Ng'ang'a, Zipporah W.
dc.contributor.author Njenga, Kariuki
dc.date.accessioned 2019-09-02T13:22:56Z
dc.date.available 2019-09-02T13:22:56Z
dc.date.issued 2019-08
dc.identifier.citation Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 24:53 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1342-078X
dc.identifier.issn 1347-4715
dc.identifier.uri https://environhealthprevmed.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12199-019-0808-6
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/4877
dc.description DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12199-019-0808-6 en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: Influenza A viruses pose a significant risk to human health because of their wide host range and ability to reassort into novel viruses that can cause serious disease and pandemics. Since transmission of these viruses between humans and pigs can be associated with occupational and environmental exposures, we investigated the association between occupational exposure to pigs, occurrence of acute respiratory illness (ARI), and influenza A virus infection. Methods: The study was conducted in Kiambu County, the county with the highest level of intensive small-scale pig farming in Kenya. Up to 3 participants (> 2 years old) per household from pig-keeping and non-pig-keeping households were randomly recruited and followed up in 2013 (Sept-Dec) and 2014 (Apr-Aug). Oropharyngeal (OP) and nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs were collected from participants with ARI at the time of study visit. For the animal study, nasal and oropharyngeal swabs, and serum samples were collected from pigs and poultry present in enrolled households. The human and animal swab samples were tested for viral nucleic acid by RT-PCR and sera by ELISA for antibodies. A Poisson generalized linear mixed-effects model was developed to assess the association between pig exposure and occurrence of ARI. Results: Of 1137 human participants enrolled, 625 (55%) completed follow-up visits including 172 (27.5%) pig workers and 453 (72.5%) non-pig workers. Of 130 human NP/OP swabs tested, four (3.1%) were positive for influenza A virus, one pig worker, and three among non-pig workers. Whereas none of the 4462 swabs collected from pig and poultry tested positive for influenza A virus by RT-PCR, 265 of 4273 (6.2%) of the sera tested positive for virus antibodies by ELISA, including 11.6% (230/1990) of the pigs and 1.5% (35/2,283) of poultry. The cumulative incidence of ARI was 16.9% among pig workers and 26.9% among the non-pig workers. The adjusted risk ratio for the association between being a pig worker and experiencing an episode of ARI was 0.56 (95% CI [0.33, 0.93]), after adjusting for potential confounders. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate moderate seropositivity for influenza A virus among pigs, suggesting the circulation of swine influenza virus and a potential for interspecies transmission. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BMC en_US
dc.subject Acute respiratory illness en_US
dc.subject Influenza A virus en_US
dc.subject Pig workers en_US
dc.subject Zoonoses en_US
dc.title Seroprevalence of influenza A virus in pigs and low risk of acute respiratory illness among pig workers in Kenya en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Dspace


Browse

My Account