Water application methods and water use efficiency for tomatoes

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Nguluu, Simon N.
dc.contributor.author Itabari, J. K.
dc.contributor.author Ikombo, B. M.
dc.contributor.author Wambua, J. M.
dc.contributor.author Gichangi, E. M.
dc.date.accessioned 2015-02-17T06:55:35Z
dc.date.available 2015-02-17T06:55:35Z
dc.date.issued 1999
dc.identifier.citation East Africa Agricultural and Forestry Journal: Vol 65, No 1&2 (1999) en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://www.eaafj.or.ke/index.php/path/article/view/159
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/938
dc.description.abstract An experiment was carried out at Kiomo Agroecological zone 5 to compare the water use efficiency (WUE) and economic benefits of using spot, modified drip (bucket) and furrow irrigation methods. Each of these application techniques was combined with 0, 10 t ha-1 of manure and DAP at 200 kg of ha-1. The use of manure combined with fertiliser produced higher quantities of fresh tomatoes, improved WUE and had higher economic benefits. The modified drip and spot irrigation with fertiliser did not differ significantly but produced higher amounts of fresh tomatoes than furrow irrigation. The WUE of spot was superior to that of the other techniques in treatments that received a combination of manure and fertiliser. Without fertiliser the modified drip had higher WUE than the rest. Applying water in spots with fertiliser and its combination with manure had the highest income followed by similar treatments using the modified drip technique. The modified drip was the most efficient in the use of labour and had higher returns in treatments with fertiliser combined with manure. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.title Water application methods and water use efficiency for tomatoes en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Dspace


Browse

My Account