Historical influences on utilising upright positions for birth in Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Atsali, Eunice N.
dc.contributor.author Edwards, Grace
dc.date.accessioned 2020-02-26T07:41:55Z
dc.date.available 2020-02-26T07:41:55Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.citation Midirs Midwifery Digest. 27(1):119–123, 2017 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0961-5555
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/5949
dc.description.abstract Birthing positions in the second stage of labour have been researched widely in the last three decades. Upright positions in this paper refer to positions attained while the spine is vertical (Sutton 2000) and other alternative positions which may facilitate normality in birth; kneeling, standing, squatting, sitting with the back at an upright angle of more than 45 degrees, all fours and lateral positions (De Jonge & Lagro-Janssen 2004). Recent evidence suggests that upright positions are associated with fewer episiotomies, less pain, reduced instrumental deliveries and shorter duration of the second stage of labour (De Jonge et al 2004,Walsh 2011,Gupta et al 2012,Nieuwenhuijze et al 2012). Moreover, there has been evidence of better neonatal outcomes and increased maternal satisfaction when compared to supine positions. Current recommendations from the UK'sNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2014) endorse the practice of women utilising alternative positions in labour and discourages use of supine positions in normal childbirth. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Midirs en_US
dc.title Historical influences on utilising upright positions for birth in Africa en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Dspace


Browse

My Account