The use of physical animal welfare indicators: a case for working donkeys in rural and urban/peri-urban areas of Mwingi central sub county-Kitui county- Kenya.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kamonzo, Joseph k.
dc.contributor.author Kanui, Titus I.
dc.contributor.author Oduma, Jemimah A.
dc.date.accessioned 2018-02-26T06:45:57Z
dc.date.available 2018-02-26T06:45:57Z
dc.date.issued 2016-12-12
dc.identifier.citation International Journal of Education and Research, Vol. 4 No. 12 December 2016 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2411-5681
dc.identifier.uri http://www.ijern.com/journal/2016/December-2016/01.pdf
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/3860
dc.description.abstract Donkeys have been serving mankind for several millions of years. The phrase the beast of burden describes their utility as pack animals in many parts of the world as they play a significant economic and social role in transport, whether riding, pack transport or pulling carts. They may also be used for farm tillage. Working donkeys suffer from various welfare constraints that need to be investigated and ameliorated. These welfare constraints significantly reduce work productivity and life of the donkey and hence the owners livelihoods. A study to determine welfare differences between working donkeys in both rural and urban/periurban settings of mwingi central sub county of kitui county-Kenya was done. A total of 396 donkeys were sampled out of a donkey population of 35,361 in the sub county. A confidence level of 95% and a sampling error of 5% were used. The 396 donkeys were proportionately allocated into urban/peri-urban and rural settings as 215 and 181 respectively. The study used donkey physical welfare parameters namely lameness, evenness of the hoof, eye conditions and body condition score to compare the two sets of animals. There was more lameness in animals working in the urban /peri-urban setting (14.4%) compared to the rural settings (11.6%). The physical welfare indicators namely hoof evenness, overgrown hooves, body wounds ,scars, eye discharges and corneal opacity were shown to have significant differences at p at p<O.05 level between the two sets of animals. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject animal welfare en_US
dc.subject donkey en_US
dc.subject physical welfare indicators en_US
dc.subject lameness en_US
dc.subject corneal opacity en_US
dc.title The use of physical animal welfare indicators: a case for working donkeys in rural and urban/peri-urban areas of Mwingi central sub county-Kitui county- Kenya. en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Dspace


Browse

My Account